Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jonathan Defez's avatar

I'll accept this analogy, but only to a point.

I think it does not go far enough. In this case, it is not simply a divorced couple who both acted badly and are irrational. This is a case of an abused woman (Israel) and an abusive husband (Hamas). To make it worse, the context would be in the deep south, say about 1955, when the judge (the ICJ, the UN, etc.) is drinking buddies with the abusive husband. Do you really think she will get the support she needs? Things will get worse, not better in this environment. Sure, the "husband" will call the ex-wife "abusive" if she acted out in any way to defend herself, and the "judge" will take those actions as justification for the real abuse perpetrated by the husband.

Good analogy, you just didn't take if far enough.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts